Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Players Marks: Coventy v Charlton

Your marks 0.5 to 10.0

Rudd:
Solly:
Bauer:
Pearce:
DaSilva:
Byrne:
Ulvestad:
Konsa:
Crofts:
Holmes:
Magennis:
Forster-Caskey:

Aribo: n/a

Comments

  • Options
    Hmmm used to enjoy reading this thread .... ... Still waiting.

    Has Coventry been hit by one of those MOAB bombs ?
  • Options
    All 6's.
  • Options
    Rudd: 8
    Solly: 6
    Bauer: 5
    Pearce: 6
    DaSilva: 7
    Byrne: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 5
    Konsa: 5.5
    Crofts: 6
    Holmes: 6
    Magennis: 6.5
    Forster-Caskey: 6.5
  • Options
    The schoolboy continues to get good reviews. Wonder if Chelsea would let him go? He still has time to grow but gets his share of headers anyway.
  • Options
    Rudd: 7.5
    Solly: 7
    Bauer: 5.5
    Pearce: 6
    DaSilva: 7
    Byrne: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 6
    Konsa: 5.5
    Crofts: 6.5
    Holmes: 7
    Magennis: 6
    Forster-Caskey: 6
  • Options
    Rudd: 9 No mistakes and several match-saving stops
    Solly: 7 Totally reliable as always, although struggled a bit for pace at times
    Bauer: 7
    Pearce: 8 Looks like our best centre back
    DaSilva: 7 Positional sense a bit erratic, but strong on the ball
    Byrne: 4.5
    Ulvestad: 4
    Konsa: 3 An advanced mid-field role is not his position
    Crofts: 8 Excellent shield for the back four, snuffing out danger through anticipation
    Holmes: 4 Looked tired and lacking in sharpness
    Magennis: 4.5 Struggled to win much in the air and hold-up play not very effective
    Forster-Caskey: 4.5 Not been too impressed by him so far
  • Options
    Rudd: 9 Some great saves and he was definitely "up for it"
    Solly: 6.5
    Bauer: 5.5 one extra mark for the goal, as defensively all over the place
    Pearce: 6
    DaSilva: 6.5
    Byrne: 5
    Ulvestad:5
    Konsa: 4 I've no idea what role he's meant to be playing at the moment
    Crofts: 6.5
    Holmes: 6
    Magennis: 7 good defensive work, battled well up front
    Forster-Caskey: 6
  • Options
    Rudd: 8
    Solly: 7
    Bauer: 6.5
    Pearce: 7
    DaSilva: 7
    Byrne: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 6
    Konsa: 5
    Crofts: 7
    Holmes: 6.5
    Magennis: 6.5
    Forster-Caskey: 6
  • Options
    edited April 2017
    Rudd: 8
    Solly: 6.5
    Bauer: 5
    Pearce: 6
    DaSilva: 6
    Byrne: 4.5
    Ulvestad: 4.5
    Konsa: 4
    Crofts: 6
    Holmes: 6.5
    Magennis: 5.5
    Forster-Caskey: 4.5

    Aribo: n/a
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Rudd. 8 Produced a couple of excellent saves to deny a potential winner.
    Solly. 7 Showed some desire.
    Bauer. 6 Not convincing defensively but he scored!
    Pearce. 6 Good game.
    DaSilva. 6 Caught out positionally a couple of times but a decent little player.
    Byrne. 6. Missed a sitter in the first half. Needs to improve consistency.
    Ulvestad. 6.5 Good vision and produced some good passes but needs more consistency.
    Konsa. 5 Too lightweight and slow for a midfield player.
    Crofts. 5.5. Good in front of defence but makes too many mistakes.
    Holmes. 6. A quiet game. His corners either never get past the first man or go straight to the goalkeeper.
    Magennis. 5. What's the use of a striker who never scores!
    Forster-Caskey. 6.5 We need someone who can grab the midfield by the scruff of the neck and he certainly made a better attempt than Konsa.
  • Options

    Rudd: 8
    Solly: 7
    Bauer: 5.5
    Pearce: 6
    DaSilva: 7
    Byrne: 7
    Ulvestad: 5
    Konsa: 5
    Crofts: 6
    Holmes: 7
    Magennis: 6.5
    Forster-Caskey: 5
  • Options

    Rudd: 8
    Solly: 5
    Bauer: 5
    Pearce: 6
    DaSilva: 5
    Byrne: 5
    Ulvestad: 5
    Konsa: 5
    Crofts: 5
    Holmes: 6
    Magennis: 5
    Forster-Caskey: 4

    Apart from a bit of good goal keeping right in front of me it was a very average game.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!