Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Northampton v Charlton

Your marks 0.5 to 10 please

Rudd:
Byrne:
Page:
Konsa:
Bauer:
Holmes:
Crofts:
Ulverstad:
Botaka:
Magennis:
Novak:
Teixeira:

Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a

Comments

  • edited March 2017
    Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 4
    Page: 3
    Konsa: 5
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 5
    Crofts: 4.5
    Ulverstad: 4
    Botaka: 5.5
    Magennis: 4.5
    Teixeira: 5
    Novak: 2.5
    Teixeira: 5

    Shit
  • Your marks 0.5 to 10 please

    Rudd: 5
    Byrne: 3
    Page: 3
    konsa 3
    Bauer: 3
    Holmes: 3
    Crofts: 3
    Ulvsted 3
    Botaka 2
    Maginess 2
    Novak: 2
    Tex 2

    Chicksen n/a
    Watt n/a

    Watt. Waste of space wanker of a player.

    Robinson 0 please fuckoff you scummy scouse wanker
  • Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 4
    Page: 3
    Konsa: 5
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 5
    Crofts: 4.5
    Ulverstad: 4
    Botaka: 5.5
    Magennis: 4.5
    Teixeira: 5
    Novak: 2.5
    Teixeira: 5

    Shit

    Lol dunno why I did two texes. We are so shit at football btw
  • Rudd 5
    Byrne 5
    Page 4
    Konsa 5
    Bauer 4
    Holmes 4
    CTOFTS 4
    Ulvestad 4
    Botaka 4
    Magennis 4
    Novak 4

    Robinson fuck off
  • Your marks 0.5 to 10 please

    Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 5
    Page: 4
    Konsa: 6
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 6
    Crofts: 4
    Ulverstad: 3
    Botaka: 6
    Magennis: 4
    Novak: 4
    Teixeira: 3

    Chicksen n/a
    Watt n/a
  • Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 5
    Page: 4
    Konsa: 5
    Bauer: 5.5
    Holmes: 5
    Crofts: 4
    Ulverstad: 4
    Botaka: 5
    Magennis: 5
    Novak: 5
    Teixeira: 4

    As others have said Watt can do one. came on for 10 minutes and if the ref hadn't been so lenient, his petulance could have got him sent off and that's not a straight red, that's 2 yellows in 10 minutes, unbelievable!
  • Rudd: 3
    Byrne: 5
    Page: 2
    Konsa: 3.5
    Bauer: 5
    Holmes: 5.5
    Crofts: 4
    Ulverstad: 4.5
    Botaka: 6
    Magennis: 3
    Novak: 4
    Teixeira: 4
  • Your marks 0.5 to 10 please

    Rudd: 5
    Byrne: 5
    Page: 3
    Konsa 4
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 5
    Crofts: 5
    Ulverstad: 5
    Botaka: 6.5
    Magennis: 4
    Novak: 4
    Teixeira: 4

    Chicksen n/a
    Watt n/a
  • edited March 2017
    Rudd: 5.5 – Not at fault for either goal IMO
    Byrne: 5.5 – First time I've seen him at RB and was pleasantly surprised during the first hour, though faded afterwards like most of his team-mates
    Page: 3 – I'm still yet to see him play well
    Konsa: 5.5 – Looked reasonably assured compared to both his CB partners, but that's not saying much
    Bauer: 4.5 – Really hasn't looked the same player over the last 2-3 months
    Holmes: 5 – Not really his day, and I'd like him to stay a bit wider (like Botaka does), especially when there are two up front, but always full of running and commitment can't be questioned
    Crofts: 5 – Not great, but I'd still have him in the team given lack of alternatives
    Ulvestad: 5 – Looked a little bit rusty, but I still prefer him to Forster-Caskey from what I've seen of the latter
    Botaka: 6 – Is direct and a willing runner, one of the few often calling for the ball. Decision-making occasionally lets him down, but I'd continue to start him. Gets an extra half-point for another (admittedly scrappy) goal
    Magennis: 4 – Hasn't looked the same player since the injury. Very poor in the second half.
    Novak: 3 – I still don't really see what he offers (and no idea why he didn't play Ulvestad in early in the second half!)
    Teixeira: 4 – Gave the ball away (as he has done so much recently!) for the second goal
  • Sponsored links:




  • Rudd: 5
    Byrne: 4
    Page: 2
    Konsa: 3
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 4.5
    Crofts: 4
    Ulvestad: 3
    Botaka: 5
    Magennis: 3
    Novak: 2
    Teixeira: 2

    Chicksen n/a
    Watt n/a (absolute waste of time. Deluded man whose ability does not match his ego or arrogance).
  • Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 5
    Page: 4
    Konsa: 5
    Bauer: 2
    Holmes: 6
    Crofts: 5
    Ulverstad: 5
    Botaka: 7 mom. our only threat.
    Magennis: 2
    Novak: 3
    Teixeira: 3

    watt: 2
  • Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 5.5 Extra marks out of sympathy as it's not his natural position
    Page: 3
    Konsa: 4
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 6 Not his best game but he tried
    Crofts: 5
    Ulverstad:5
    Botaka: 6.5 Always a willing outlet
    Magennis: 5
    Novak: 5
    Teixeira: 4

    Watt 2, lucky to not be sent off in his brief cameo
  • Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 6
    Page: 3.5
    Konsa: 3.5
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 6
    Crofts: 4.5
    Ulverstad: 3.5
    Botaka: 6.5
    Magennis: 3
    Novak: 3.5
    Teixeira: 3
  • Rudd: 6 - decent enough, although flapped at a cross second half
    Byrne: 5 - he's not a full back, Solly's return can't come quick enough
    Page: 4 - nothing to suggest he can sufficiently replace or even surpass fox
    Konsa: 6 - looked OK in a poor defence
    Bauer: 5 - seems to have lost it. Now looks a league one player on this Performance!
    Holmes: 6 - plenty of effort but faded in the second half
    Crofts: 4 - the central midfield partnership with ulvestad under slade returned, it still doesn't work
    Ulverstad: 4 - see crofts comment, although probably rusty following his recent absence
    Botaka: 6 - he saw a lot of the ball in second half, but largely uneffective. One extra point for the goal.
    Magennis: 4 - I expected better from him
    Novak: 3 - tried to make a run from halfway line in second half but ran into no man's land and gave it away easily. Competing with watt to be the fattest forward at charlton
    Teixeira: 4 - meant to be our best centre half but bloody awful today. Gave the ball away cheaply on several occasions including their second goal.

    Chicksen n/a shame the mark doesn't apply to him. He should have played instead of page
    Watt n/a - good job the mark doesn't apply to him, never looked like he could change things to pull it back
  • Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 5
    Page: 3
    Konsa: 6.5
    Bauer: 4.5
    Holmes: 5.5
    Crofts: 5
    Ulverstad: 4.5
    Botaka: 6.5
    Magennis: 6
    Novak: 5
    Teixeira: 4

    Chicksen n/a
    Watt n/a
  • very generous marks being given
  • Rudd: 6 - no real chance with either goal.The problems are in front of him.
    Byrne: 5 - did ok, given he's playing out of position.
    Page: 4 - better than his last game but still a weak link. His positional sense is poor, as is his use of the ball. Chicksen will hopefully return on Tuesday.
    Konsa: 6 - did alright in an otherwise shaky defence.
    Bauer: 4 - bullied by Michael Smith from the off. His form has gone down the tubes,
    Holmes: 5.5 - tried very hard but nothing came off for him on the day.
    Crofts: 4 - tries hard but is just not up to it.
    Ulverstad: 4 - really weak.
    Botaka: 6 - blows hot and cold but at least offered something offensively.
    Magennis: 3 - bloody awful. Looked as if he had lead in his boots.
    Novak: 3 - see Magennis.
    Teixeira: 4 - see Bauer.
  • Rudd: 6 Couldn't of done anything for either of their goals. A decent keeper just got a load of rubbish in front of him
    Byrne: 6 An OK performance, all their joy came down Page's flank
    Page: 2 Thought he was rubbish.
    Konsa: 5 OK. One decent run towards the centre circle. Got bullied by Smith though
    Bauer: 3 Did not win a single header - his regression increasingly notcibable
    Holmes: 6.5 Only exciting player we have, not afraid to run at the oppo
    Crofts: 5 Static very sidewasey
    Ulverstad: 4.5 not great
    Botaka: 6 I don't really think he knows what he is doing most of the time but put in a few good balls, and managed to find the net
    Magennis: 2.5 So so bad, what happened to the old him?
    Novak: 2.5 See Magennis, but he was never good
    Teixeira: 4 Like the other defenders was bullied by Smith
  • Rudd: 6
    Byrne: 6
    Page: 4
    Konsa: 6
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 7 - MOM (not saying much though and faded in the second half)
    Crofts: 5
    Ulverstad: 4
    Botaka: 6 (+1 for the goal)
    Magennis: 4 (clearly not fit)
    Novak: 3
    Teixeira: 3

    Chicksen n/a (looked positive when he came on)
    Watt n/a (with each additional game played for Charlton, he looks less likely to make a positive contribution...)
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rudd: 6.5
    Byrne: 4
    Page: 4.5
    Konsa: 6.5
    Bauer: 4
    Holmes: 6
    Crofts: 5
    Ulverstad: 5.5
    Botaka: 6
    Magennis: 4.5
    Novak: 4
    Teixeira: 4
  • Rudd: 6, his Kicking was poor but pulled off one good save.
    Byrne:5 light wait
    Page: 4 just not goodenough
    Konsa: 6
    Bauer:4, but must have been still suffering from the blow to the head from last week
    Holmes: 7 best player on the pitch.
    Crofts: 5 did very little
    Ulverstad: 5 not into the game
    Botaka:6 second best Charlton player
    Magennis: 5 was out matched, won very few headers.
    Novak: 5 did his best.
    Teixeir 4poor.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!