STATBANK - Wendies 2-3 Charlton "SORDELL SHOOTS TO THE TOP" plus the A&E Indicator

lancashire lad

many thanks to the 15 Lifers who gave their marks, averages as follows:

Sordell---------- 8.73 MoM
Harriott----------- 7.37
Poyet------------- 7.17
Solly-------------- 6.99
Fox--------------- 6.93
Cousins----------- 6.93
Jackson----------- 6.77
Ajdarevic---------- 6.67
Dervite------------ 6.63
Hamer------------ 6.40
Morrison---------- 6.10
Church------------ 6.07
Team---6.90

for those who want a bit more: https://us.v-cdn.net/5000498/uploads/FileUpload/59/4555f0ee8d374a9327262a2e03b74e.pdf

danny777

Cort started a couple of games near the beginning of the season (P4 - "cumulative stats for players who received marks in less than 15games")

lancashire lad

danny777 said:

Cort started a couple of games near the beginning of the season (P4 - "cumulative stats for players who received marks in less than 15games")

thanks Danny I'll include him in the next statbank

LuckyReds

Does the top 6 (Sordell aside, who got a hatrick - so naturally his place is understandable!) make anyone else feel rather proud?

Harriott, Poyet, Solly, Fox and Cousins. Perfect.

Leuth

Dear LL,

On behalf of good sense and reason,

Can you please stop taking Stig Thundercock's obviously spiteful/trollish/hobbyhorsical/ridiculous marks into account when calculating the averages? Sordell should be 8.86 and Ajdarevic far closer to 7.

I know the player marks are subjective and if we all thought the same it'd be a very dull website, but just look at some of the shit that poster has come out with - his sheer inability to see beyond a grudge and his propensity to handing out absurdly low marks for next to no reason.

That's me done.

JollyRobin

lancashire lad

Leuth said:

Dear LL,

On behalf of good sense and reason,

Can you please stop taking Stig Thundercock's obviously spiteful/trollish/hobbyhorsical/ridiculous marks into account when calculating the averages? Sordell should be 8.86 and Ajdarevic far closer to 7.

I know the player marks are subjective and if we all thought the same it'd be a very dull website, but just look at some of the shit that poster has come out with - his sheer inability to see beyond a grudge and his propensity to handing out absurdly low marks for next to no reason.

That's me done.

So Leuth should I just ignore Stig Thundercocks' marks for Ajdarevic and Sordell or all his others which are similar to other Lifer's marks? The answer is no I won't ignore then as they are his point of view. Many people mark in different ways and I do not have the right to censor the marks but only to process them for you all to draw your own conclusions on the result.

Stig

8.73, super score Marvin. From what I can see that's the second best performance go the season. Beaten only by Hamer at Leeds.