Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Your like/lol/abuse count

13468912

Comments

  • Options
    There was this guy who wore a Yellow shirt, yellow shorts, yellow socks and yellow boots. I called him Banana Man and got 3 abuse strikes!
  • Options
    vffvff
    edited May 2014

    533 Like
    313 LOL
    1 Abuse
    1 Promote

    Feck me, does that mean I'm more likeable than funny?

    Also can't believe I've only got one abuse flag - I would have thought all the dimwitted, Daily Mail reading, knuckle-dragging, UKIP-voting, poor-spelling, right-wing loons on here would be frothing at the mouth to flag me up...

    I already did that one, Leroy. Except I just called everyone a c***.
    Determined to get that count up eh wheresmyticket? ;-)
  • Options
    Some of the posts I see get flagged on here do not warrant it.
  • Options

    Some of the posts I see get flagged on here do not warrant it.

    Gave this a LOL, but took it off as I realised it was the Flag I was LOLling at! :-)
  • Options
    vffvff
    edited May 2014
    Red Robin did sit that one right up. There's some proper jokers on the site :-)
  • Options
    2k like
    1.3k lol
    3 abuse

    Think people laugh at me rather than with me
  • Options

    Like:108
    Lol:55
    Abuse:4
    I upset a few people on saturday lol

    Like:319
    Lol:280
    Abuse:5 Someone joined the party late with that extra abuse
  • Options
    Like 42
    Lol 16

    Not bad considering I reckon I've only had 50 odd posts in the last year, quality not quantity folks!
  • Options
    Stone said:

    There was this guy who wore a Yellow shirt, yellow shorts, yellow socks and yellow boots. I called him Banana Man and got 3 abuse strikes!

    @Stone I defended you at the time on that one and think got a like off you for it :-)
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    0-promote
    102-like
    85-lol
    9-abuse

    My abuse flags were 1 on saying NLA seems to have a brilliant tattoo artist
    6 on a tongue in cheek 'london is an awful city comment.
    1 on saying 'RIP ronnie Biggs... Dead criminal yay'
    And the only one I can actually understand was mistaking This post r.e Danny green;

    Robbo got zero flags and I got about 12 however the majority were rescinded when I found out that DG was actually doing a really nice thing.

    T.C.E said:

    is there anything Danny Green is good at?

    BALLER!
    oh.
    It seems he's a not a bad fella
    Surprised he got the right house
    Dazzler21 said:

    Lucy had fallen asleep before Danny Green delivered any end product.

    I then had to make the following apology.
    Dazzler21 said:

    T.C.E said:

    Young Lucy is in the last stages of a terminal illness, I'm sure any references to this beautiful young lady in addition to Opinions on Danny Greens footballing skills
    should be kept separate.

    Sorry all wasn't aware of this!
    Apologies for any offence caused by this:
    Dazzler21 said:

    Lucy had fallen asleep before Danny Green delivered any end product.

    Feel a bit of a dick now!
    A few flags were then rescinded.

    I'm not sure how much I agree with flagging at the moment!
  • Options
    26 likes
    30 Lols
    01 abuse

    I received abuse for speaking of the taboo subject that is the CL clique. :(
  • Options
    246 likes
    282 Lots of loves
    1 completely unjustified abuse flag from the time when I was asked which one in the image was new manager, Jose Riga, and I suggested he was the one with Roland's hand stuck up his arse.

    (The subtle implication that he was Mr Duchatalet's new ventriloquist's dummy proved later to be entirely innacurate but was hardly abusive.)

  • Options
    Friend or Defoe once flagged me for saying their was a pitch inspection at 11am for the Wednesday game. Really?
  • Options
    I got a flag for my earwig joke. Strange.
  • Options

    I got a flag for my earwig joke. Strange.

    What was the earwig joke AA ?
  • Options
    vffvff
    edited May 2014
    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.
  • Options
    7.59
  • Options
    I've got 0 abuse... Go on I dare ya.
  • Options
    edited May 2014
    Is an abuse equal to a like?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options

    2k like
    1.3k lol
    3 abuse

    Think people laugh at me rather than with me

    1 promote
    172 likes
    172 lols

    Yeah @ValleyGary we'll call it a draw! :-)
  • Options
    vff said:

    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.

    Well that is me fecked then. /8 abuses
  • Options

    vff said:

    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.

    Well that is me fecked then. /8 abuses
    Soapy Jones - 514 LOL / 218 likes / 8 abuse

    Soapy Jones - 3378 posts / 218 - 8 = 16

    There is 514 LOL. There must be a way to fit that in.
  • Options
    vff said:

    vff said:

    Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.

    636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074

    2074 / 635= 3.26

    That makes the quality score as 3.26.

    The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.

    Well that is me fecked then. /8 abuses
    Soapy Jones - 514 LOL / 218 likes / 8 abuse

    Soapy Jones - 3378 posts / 218 - 8 = 16

    There is 514 LOL. There must be a way to fit that in.
    What about promotes? Count for anything?
  • Options
    Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.
  • Options
    vff said:

    Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.

    I have 617 likes and 1 promote (no abuse) but 5000 odd posts so what's the calculation? I have a feeling I'm not going to like this game...
  • Options
    Actually, that metric doesn't work. "Likes" etc were only introduced this year, therefore anyone that hasn't just signed up will be disadvantaged and those that have been around since the beginning, more so.
  • Options

    vff said:

    Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.

    I have 617 likes and 1 promote (no abuse) but 5000 odd posts so what's the calculation? I have a feeling I'm not going to like this game...
    Well. 5,000 / 617 = 8.1
    The promote should move up to at least 7.1.

    Sadie Jane, the scoring probably would only make good sense as the LOL / Likes have only been around for a while. So maybe many of your comments did not have the opportunity to be appreciated.
  • Options
    It's all in good fun I know but there are some amazing posters on here that as lookout said would score quite low because of the high quantity of posts before the feature, it is a fun feature though, other forums have a star rating system, we have points as our equivalent ;-)
  • Options
    What's the prize ?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!