Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Player marks: Huddersfield v Charlton

AFKABartram
Posts: 57,825
Be grateful if you were one of the 278 you could provide some marks please
Hamer
Wood
Morrison
Dervite
Wilson
Wiggins
Stephens
Jackson
Pritchard
Church
Sordell
Stewart n/a
Harriott n/a
Hamer
Wood
Morrison
Dervite
Wilson
Wiggins
Stephens
Jackson
Pritchard
Church
Sordell
Stewart n/a
Harriott n/a
0
Comments
-
Hamer - 6 Still looks shaky but some good catches
Wood - 6.5 Did ok.
Morrison - 7 Star man at the back
Dervite - 6
Wilson - 5 Sluggish
Wiggins - 6.5 Lots of energy going forward. Crossing not so good.
Stephens - 6 Mixed Bag
Jackson - 7 Charlton MoM. Showed more passion than any of the others.
Pritchard -7 Good effort again.
Church - 5 Poor. Completely devoid of confidence
Sordell -5.5 Anonymous for most of the match.
Stewart and Harriott - both 7 for their cameos.
0 -
Hamer - 6.5 Average Performance not really tested
Wood - 6.5
Morrison - 7 Won majority of his battles and carried ball out of defence well
Dervite - 6.5 Did ok few wayward hopeless long balls
Wilson - 6 Some solid defending but wasteful going forward
Wiggins - 6.5
Stephens - 6 Got into decent positions to recieve dwelling on the ball too long to create anything tho
Jackson - 7 MOM his anger when we conceded the first goal showed his passion wanted it more then the rest.
Pritchard - 7 Pressing off the ball good look ok in possession.
Church - 6 Bit of pace and lots of running but no real threat
Sordell - 5.5 Anonymous marked out the game so easy didn't even bother to jump to win the ball in the air.
Stewart & Harriott both changed the tempo of the game with their direct running.0 -
Hamer 6 still looks shaky
Wood 7
Morrison 7
Dervite 7
Wilson 6
Wiggins 6
Stephens 6
Jackson 7
Pritchard 7
Church 6
Sordell 4 very poor
Stewart n/a
Harriott n/a0 -
Hamer-6.5
Wood-6
Morrison-7 my MoM
Dervite-6.5
Wilson-6 better second half.
Wiggins-6
Stephens-6
Jackson-7
Pritchard-6.5
Church-5.5
Sordell-5 frustrating0 -
Hamer 6 couldn't do much for either goal
Wood 5.5
Morrison 6
Dervite 5.5
Wilson 5.5 final ball not good enough, rest of his game was good
Wiggins 5.5 same as wilson
Stephens 6
Jackson 7 Three centre mids looked good, and the skip put in a great shift
Pritchard 6
Church 5 booking looked a dive to me, I was fairly close
Sordell 4.5 weak on the ball, easily dispossessed
Verdict: Not worried... yet, plenty of possession and if Kerm was on the pitch we would have drawn/won. Point would have been a fair result for me.0 -
Hamer 5.5 lacking in confidence
Wood 6 all three defenders solid except for the one error
Morrison 6
Dervite 6
Wilson 5.5 poor final ball
Wiggins 5.5 too many short passes not enough centres
Stephens 6.5 this style suits him
Jackson 7 never gave up trying and probably wore himself out
Pritchard 5.5 ran about a lot and passed to Hudds players a lot
Church 5.5 chickened out of some 50/50 balls
Sordell 3 and I'm being kind, offered to drop him off at the Reebok on my way home
0 -
Hamer 6.5- I thought he looked good dealing with crosses, bad marking was at fault for the first goal.
Wood - 6
Morrison- 7
Dervite - 6.5
Wilson - 6 lacked energy
Wiggins - 6
Stephens - 6.5a few decent passes but like a lot of the midfield lacking in energy and fight
Jackson - 6.5
Pritchard - 7 the only player who was putting in a shift in the middle of the park first half
Church - 6 very bad dive , a lot of running no real threat
Sordell - 5 really does not look interested
Stewart n/a 7 made a big difference with speed and enthusiasm cracker of a goal
Harriott n/a 7 linked up well to create a few late chances obviously very eager to get back in the team
0 -
Hamer 6
Wood 6.5
Morrison 7.5 great first half
Dervite 6
Wilson 6
Wiggins 6
Stephens 6
Jackson 7
Pritchard 7
Church 5
Sordell 4 useless
0 -
AFKABartram said:
Be grateful if you were one of the 278 you could provide some marks please
Hamer 5 (if Steve Brown had been in goal it still would have been 2-1)
Wood 6
Morrison 6
Dervite 6
Wilson 5 (crossing needs to improve. Solly would be better in 3-5-2)
Wiggins 5 (in a 3-5-2 we need to be bold enough to try harriott or Stewart)
Stephens 6
Jackson 6
Pritchard 6
Church 5
Sordell 5 (unfairly slated. How many minutes has he played for us before he is being written off?)
Stewart n/a
Harriott n/a0 -
Hamer - 6
Wood - 6
Morrison - 6
Dervite - 6
Wilson - 6
Wiggins - 5 his crossing and passing were poor
Stephens - 5.5 faded in second half
Jackson - 7
Pritchard - 6.5 worked tirelessly
Church - 5.5 won little in the air, didn't stop us regularly pumping the ball up to him
Sordell - 4 just didn't appear to try0 - Sponsored links:
-
Shrew, you missed out Stephens' mark.0
-
Hamer - 5
Wood - 6
Morrison - 7
Dervite - 6
Wilson - 5
Wiggins - 6
Stephens - 6
Jackson - 7
Pritchard - 6
Church - 4
Sordell - 4
Stewart - 7
Harriott - 6
Need to player wingers Stewart and harriot from the start! We actually looked dangerous with them 2 on the pitch but it was too late . Church and sordell was very poor .0 -
Interesting marks, thanks to the guys that went0
-
It is very worrying that Sordell is scoring so low. With his track record I think most of us were pleased that we got him for the season. There must be a very good footballer in there somewhere and we won't unlock that potential unless he plays -but we can't really afford a passenger until he comes good. A dilemma.0
-
Hamer - 6
Wood - 6
Morrison - 7
Dervite - 6
Wilson - 5.5
Wiggins - 6
Stephens - 7.5
Jackson - 7
Pritchard - 6.5
Church - 5
Sordell - 5
Harriott- 7
Stewart - 8
0 -
Hamer 6
Wood 6
Morrison 6
Dervite 6
Wilson 7
Wiggins 6
Stephens 7
Jackson 6.5
Pritchard 6
Church6
Sordell5
Stewart 7
Harriott 60