Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Would Ya? - All or Nothing!

Rizzo
Rizzo Posts: 6,435
edited August 2011 in Root
A new Would Ya?, but with a twist. You can have both or neither.

image

And:

image

Comments

  • Yep i would both of them maggie 1st thoughj so i could really enjoy rachel
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,979
    both...although that countdown birds a right old dog
  • At the same time!
  • Dizzle
    Dizzle Posts: 5,190
    hahaha Yeah why not. Maggie would be a hate f*ck though
  • johnny73
    johnny73 Posts: 4,567
    this is twisted. Would need to think about this.
  • this is so cruel..... But i'd say yes just for Rachel  
  • ALl or nothing for these.....
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    Yes to the above.

    I'm a little surprised that we haven't had a no to Maggie yet. Have I stumbled upon the Lifers secret fantasy?
  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,784
    Well, Maggie F@#ked most of us older guys during the 80's anyway, so it would be payback time.

    I probably wouldn't make it as far as removing Rachels knickers before making sex wee.
  • Marriott110
    Marriott110 Posts: 1,528
    Yes, but i don't know what order.
  • Sponsored links:



  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    edited August 2011
    I probably wouldn't make it as far as removing Rachels knickers before making sex wee.




    thats why it would have to be maggie first last longer 2nd time round


    as for fat heather and the other treacle

    all day long the fitter one first so that i could give heath the seeing to she desrves
  • Leroy Ambrose
    Leroy Ambrose Posts: 14,436
    That's not Jolie - it's Megan Fox, I believe. Jolie-Lite.

    And it's an unqualified 'no' to btoth - i hate Thatcher so much that I'd kill myself before touching her, and I don't like Fox anyway - and certainly not enough to climb on board that Bella Emberg lookielikey
  • Macronate
    Macronate Posts: 12,892

    Would Rachel & Maggie be allowed to touch each other?

    If so, I'd just live with those memories and leave it at that

  • Addicted
    Addicted Posts: 2,804
    Id screw my way through most of CL if it meant getting a go on Rachel, so Maggies a given
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,979
    id f*ck any of you to have a go with megan fox
  • id f*ck any of you to have a go with megan fox


    pmsfl

     

    apple all over the screen just then

     

     

    i didnt look proper id also smash every one on here to have megan fox

  • Redmidland
    Redmidland Posts: 44,700
    As in American Pie (not sure which one)....but I'd act as Stiffler and take one for the team.....just to shag Rachel!!....so yes I'd do Maggie so none of you have to..... as tangoflash said she screwed us older ones in the 80's!!


    BUT I get Rachel first....no sticky seconds thanks!!
  • sadiejane1981
    sadiejane1981 Posts: 9,012
    well I'm sure you all will be happy stirring each other's porridge ewww lol
  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,784
    well I'm sure you all will be happy stirring each other's porridge ewww lol
    Not me, i'll sneak round the back door. ; )
  • superclive
    superclive Posts: 1,809
    rizzo,  what was going through your mind when you put this up there ........ ? 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,737
    I think it had to be a yes. Megan fox must be worth it ?
  • creepyaddick
    creepyaddick Posts: 6,152
    Rachel on 8 out of 10 cats tonight, very nice!
  • ads
    ads Posts: 3,224
    rizzo,  what was going through your mind when you put this up there ........ ? 
    it's what he dreams about at night
  • bloodnut
    bloodnut Posts: 2,146

    yea id be up for any of them... simply glory hole the ugly ones and stick a pic up (your side) of the good looking ones while your going about it... job done!

     

    next.