Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

darren bent and joe hart for england

edited April 2010 in General Charlton
darren bent has scored more goals than crouch, heskey and defoe and hes playin for sunderland. i think that hes better than defoe and heskey and crouch yet hes not in the england squad. also joe hart has been brilliannt this season so i think he deserves a place in the world cup
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Add Scott Parker to that list.
  • Options
    Sadly i think out of the 3 only Hart will make it to the 23!

    Darren Bent should go, but wont!
  • Options
    And Dawson.
  • Options
    if cappello is true to his word he will take darren bent he said that he will take player who are on form and i cant think of any other strikers in better form than darren bent
  • Options
    I remember reading reports that Capello will only take 4 strikers. Rooney, Heskey, Crouch and Defoe look like the most probable. Who would Bent nick the spot from? Maybe Crouch or Heskey but I reckon Capello wants to stay with two big strikers and two who can play off them.
  • Options
    heskey has done nutin this season and hes never ever gunna score aginst a descent team so he shouldnt go
  • Options
    Agreed 24 league goals. Only 1 or 2 behind Rooney and Drogba who play for better teams. He definitely deserves a place.
  • Options
    Much though we all love him, I just don't think Bent's style is well-suited to international football - he's had a couple of chances and looked totally out of the game on each occasion. He could do a job but being prolific for Sunderland, as he was for us, won't necessarily make him a goal machine for England.
    I wish it were otherwise.
  • Options
    Benty has deserved a place way before now, I just fear he hasn't been given enough time to prove how well he gels with the rest of the England squad.

    What about Joe Hart as well? I'd probably have him as number 1 given the form he's been on this season. Robert Green and David James in reserve.
  • Options
    Capello will only take 4 strikers, he's a rigid manager in approach who wants 2 players per position.

    Therefore, barring injury or a really really surprising call, there is no place in the final 23 for Bent, Zamora, Agbonlahor, Cole or even Kevin Davies...
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: PeanutsMolloy[/cite]Much though we all love him, I just don't think Bent's style is well-suited to international football

    Agree. I think we all know Bent isn't going to be in the starting 11 but I don't feel he's the type of player that can grab a goal after coming on in the 80th minute. Instead, he proves his worth over the full 90 minutes.
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: PeanutsMolloy[/cite]Much though we all love him, I just don't think Bent's style is well-suited to international football - he's had a couple of chances and looked totally out of the game on each occasion. He could do a job but being prolific for Sunderland, as he was for us, won't necessarily make him a goal machine for England.
    I wish it were otherwise.

    I can't recall any goal Defoe has scored for England that I didn't think Bent could score. What do you think the problems are with Bent's style? I must confess he has excelled in teams that relied on counter attacking, whereas for Spurs he was up against teams who would sit back a bit more and he wasn't quite as effective (I guess this is a parallel to the sort of tactics England might come up against).
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: ISawLeaburnScore[/cite]Capello will only take 4 strikers, he's a rigid manager in approach who wants 2 players per position.

    Therefore, barring injury or a really really surprising call, there is no place in the final 23 for Bent, Zamora, Agbonlahor, Cole or even Kevin Davies...

    Capello won't take 2 left wingers though will he? The only English candidates playing regularly on the left wing in the Prem are Downing and Ashley Young and they play for the same team! Even Adam Johnson is playing right wing for Man City. You only need 2 players who *can* play in a certain position, so it's definitely possible to take 7 midfielders/defenders who can cover all 4 positions across the pitch in a 2 players per position ratio, which would allow us to take a 5th striker.
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]
    I can't recall any goal Defoe has scored for England that I didn't think Bent could score. What do you think the problems are with Bent's style? I must confess he has excelled in teams that relied on counter attacking, whereas for Spurs he was up against teams who would sit back a bit more and he wasn't quite as effective (I guess this is a parallel to the sort of tactics England might come up against).

    The counter-attacking point is the only reason I can think of. He did well for the U21s but its the difficulty he's had getting into the game when he's played for England that's really disappointed - however I can't disagree with you about Defoe's goals. I'd love to see him go but would be wary of too high expectations.
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: ISawLeaburnScore[/cite]Capello will only take 4 strikers, he's a rigid manager in approach who wants 2 players per position.

    Therefore, barring injury or a really really surprising call, there is no place in the final 23 for Bent, Zamora, Agbonlahor, Cole or even Kevin Davies...

    Capello won't take 2 left wingers though will he? The only English candidates playing regularly on the left wing in the Prem are Downing and Ashley Young and they play for the same team! Even Adam Johnson is playing right wing for Man City. You only need 2 players who *can* play in a certain position, so it's definitely possible to take 7 midfielders/defenders who can cover all 4 positions across the pitch in a 2 players per position ratio, which would allow us to take a 5th striker.

    You can make a case for it but for me that's as far as it goes. Firstly, when you say he won't take 2 left wingers you haven't included Joe Cole as a contender there, a role he has played in the vast majority of his international caps. To say he'd take 2 of Downing, Young, Johnson (only playing at RW now because Bellamy is so left-footed) and Cole is a fairly logical bet. Secondly, you've picked a very specific position there. If you'd have said "wingers"... I'd bet he'll take 4. The fact three might be predominantly right-sided is fairly irrelevant to the fact that they'd all be "wingers" as a cohort, that might be the flexibility you are referring to.

    It's just the way I see it. Capello is 4-4-2. Capello is methodical, considered and consistent in his tactics. He has also expressly stated his "two" philosophy as far as positions go. Personally I'd make a case for deploying Rooney alone in a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 variant and perhaps not taking such a rigid 3-8-8-4 squad but it's just not what I think Capello will do.
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: ISawLeaburnScore[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: ISawLeaburnScore[/cite]Capello will only take 4 strikers, he's a rigid manager in approach who wants 2 players per position.

    Therefore, barring injury or a really really surprising call, there is no place in the final 23 for Bent, Zamora, Agbonlahor, Cole or even Kevin Davies...

    Capello won't take 2 left wingers though will he? The only English candidates playing regularly on the left wing in the Prem are Downing and Ashley Young and they play for the same team! Even Adam Johnson is playing right wing for Man City. You only need 2 players who *can* play in a certain position, so it's definitely possible to take 7 midfielders/defenders who can cover all 4 positions across the pitch in a 2 players per position ratio, which would allow us to take a 5th striker.

    You can make a case for it but for me that's as far as it goes. Firstly, when you say he won't take 2 left wingers you haven't included Joe Cole as a contender there, a role he has played in the vast majority of his international caps. To say he'd take 2 of Downing, Young, Johnson (only playing at RW now because Bellamy is so left-footed) and Cole is a fairly logical bet. Secondly, you've picked a very specific position there. If you'd have said "wingers"... I'd bet he'll take 4. The fact three might be predominantly right-sided is fairly irrelevant to the fact that they'd all be "wingers" as a cohort, that might be the flexibility you are referring to.

    It's just the way I see it. Capello is 4-4-2. Capello is methodical, considered and consistent in his tactics. He has also expressly stated his "two" philosophy as far as positions go. Personally I'd make a case for deploying Rooney alone in a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 variant and perhaps not taking such a rigid 3-8-8-4 squad but it's just not what I think Capello will do.

    Can't argue with too much of that. I think you're right that he will stick to 3-8-8-4, I was merely arguing the sort of squad I would go for. I only left out Joe Cole from the left wing discussion because I don't really class him as a left winger (haven't seen much of Chelsea recently - is he playing left wing for them?). Take your point on me being specific about left wing as opposed to general 'wingers'. There is a lot of specialisation in that position though - I couldn't see Lennon, Walcott, SWP or Beckham (I know he's injured) being anywhere near as effective on the left.

    I would go for a 4-4-1-1 with Gerrard just off Rooney. I'm not that big a fan of Gerrard but if we play him in his best position he'd be far more of an asset. If we played him centre midfield Lampard would get overrun so SG can't play there- he rarely plays there for Liverpool either.

    Not sure about Bellamy being left footed either, but that's a bit irrelevant :)
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]Not sure about Bellamy being left footed either, but that's a bit irrelevant :)

    that was rubbish off the top of my head to be honest, I think Mancini is playing him there as he likes odd-footers cutting in from wide not because he's left-footed, wasn't thinking that part of my post through before I wrote it!
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]whereas for Spurs he was up against teams who would sit back a bit more and he wasn't quite as effective (I guess this is a parallel to the sort of tactics England might come up against).

    And he was still Spurs top scorer last year I believe.

    Problem with Bent, (& this sounds so stupid saying this) but he doesn't seem to do anything else apart from score! Whereas Rooney & Defoe are capable of scoring from nothing, a mazy run or a thunderous strike, and Crouch & Heskey are good for others to play off, hold it up, bully defenders, bit awkward etc, Bent sort of doesn't excel at either.

    Almost all of his goals have been tap ins. Right place, right time, can't teach that, fantastic. But doesn't seem to offer much else. & on the international stage you need to offer a little more or be so clinical in front of goal that the one half chance a game is in the net. Bent doesn't do that either.

    I like him & I'd take him, but I feel the above is why so many ain't keen on him.
  • Options
    Gary Lineker only scored goals too ....
  • Options
    I was going to mention Lineker and say he was a lot more clinical than Bent.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Fillipo Inzaghi just scored goals....70 for AC Milan & 25 in 57 Italian caps. Pretty poor alround footballer though.
  • Options
    Inzaghi was the worst exponent of the offside rule ever!

    And yes Lineker was VERY clinical - however he got that through playing football at the highest level - if Bent got a run of games for England and played for Liverpool or another top 4 side and was their man goalscorer - his game would improve ten fold.
  • Options
    Probably true. I've already said I'd take him. Just stated why I think others don't rate him as highly as Ipswich, Charlton, Sunderland and one Millwall fan does.
  • Options
    I reckon he will get 45 minutes against Mexico.....and he will need to score to have any chance of going.
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: Sparrows Lane Lion[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]whereas for Spurs he was up against teams who would sit back a bit more and he wasn't quite as effective (I guess this is a parallel to the sort of tactics England might come up against).

    And he was still Spurs top scorer last year I believe.

    Problem with Bent, (& this sounds so stupid saying this) but he doesn't seem to do anything else apart from score! Whereas Rooney & Defoe are capable of scoring from nothing, a mazy run or a thunderous strike, and Crouch & Heskey are good for others to play off, hold it up, bully defenders, bit awkward etc, Bent sort of doesn't excel at either.

    Almost all of his goals have been tap ins. Right place, right time, can't teach that, fantastic. But doesn't seem to offer much else. & on the international stage you need to offer a little more or be so clinical in front of goal that the one half chance a game is in the net. Bent doesn't do that either.

    I like him & I'd take him, but I feel the above is why so many ain't keen on him.

    I see what you're saying, but I think I'd rather have a player who scores goals but does nothing else, than someone like Heskey who rarely scores. It's taken Heskey 5 seasons to score as many goals as Bent has this season! I realise you say you rate him, I'm trying to just add a bit more to Bent's case for going.
  • Options
    mark Bright said Bent would not go in his column in the Metro this morning:

    http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/823514-mark-bright-sunderlands-darren-bent-wont-go-to-world-cup-with-england
  • Options
    [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]I see what you're saying, but I think I'd rather have a player who scores goals but does nothing else, than someone like Heskey who rarely scores. It's taken Heskey5 seasonsto score as many goals as Bent has this season! I realise you say you rate him, I'm trying to just add a bit more to Bent's case for going.
    Bent would do well alongside Heskey, rather than as a replacement. Saw that this season playing alongisde Jones rather than Defoe, which didn't suit him.

    He should probably go as the fifth striker simply because he's on form, but I can see why he probably won't. If England need a goal, Capello would always put Defoe on first. He might only take four strikers and instead take a midfielder that's different to what we have.
  • Options
    When Bent was with you, was he not quite adept at holding the ball up and strong in the air?

    It's just that I've always thought he was capable of that but he hasn't shown much of that since and as Scoham says, he is probably better alongside a big man rather than playing the big man role.

    Shame really because after the season he has had if anyone deserves to go it is him.
  • Options
    Yes he did but we also played him to his main strengths, using his pace to get behind defences and getting on the end of crosses. He's decent in the air and strong enough, but he's not as powerful as someone like Heskey or quite as good in the air.
  • Options
    From crosses I'd say he's better in the air than Heskey- certainly scores far more headed goals than Emile does. From long balls forward, he's not as good.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!